Thursday, December 26, 2019

On harm to the eye due to observing a solar eclipse

An annular (not total) solar eclipse is due to occur in India on 26 Dec. 2019, after total ones on 11 Aug. 1999 amd 22 Jul. 2009.


1. Are piercing and dangerous rays or EM waves of a peculiar nature emitted during a solar eclipse?

A solar eclipse is an obscuring, interposing, occluding, or occultation, of the sun by another celestial body. The EM waves emitted then are exactly of the same nature as from the sun in plain sight, unobscured, or, even better, merely a portion of it. During a total (not annular) eclipse, the solar corona comes to view (as the ring), because the sun itself is obscured; but the EM waves emitted then are always there, only that they are more evident than with an unobscured sun.

2. How does observing the sun normally, i. e., unobscured, compare with observing it under (partial) eclipse?

It is exactly the same. Even in normal circumstances, one does not stare at the sun; and deliberately doing so contrary to natural instinct harms the eye. What is peculiar about observing the sun in eclipse is two-fold:

a. Exposure: When in eclipse, the sun appears less bright than normal, and thus the natural instinct in the observer of looking away from it after a minuscule amount of time is suppressed in the mind due to an error in cognition; thus the tendency to stare at it for longer times, normally impossible to tolerate. All the same, the EM waves emitted are just as dangerous as from the unobscured sun; partial obscuring or occultation of the sun does not reduce the harm of the rays emitted from its visible portion.

b. Aperture: Again, since the sun appears less bright than normal, the iris dilates the pupil to an uncustomary extent, and more of incident EM waves are let in to the retina than usual.

Both these causes result in greater irradiation of the retina and harm to the sensory cells (retinopathy). Some describe it as the burning of the retina by solar rays, but this is only a metaphor; no pain is felt, as testimonies show; only gradually is it realised by the observer that the sight has been impaired; and the harm comes more from the UV and higher frequencies above the visual spectrum than from the IR and lower frequencies which carry heat.

In my opinion, only these two things (and not any kind of peculiar rays or EM waves radiated just during an eclipse) give any particularity to watching the sun under eclipse; and these arise on the side of the observer, not on the side of the sun or the moon.

Of course, during totality (not partiality or annularity), which lasts at most a few minutes (the longest duration is about 7 1/2 minutes), it is completely secure and harmless to look at the sun, unaided. But one must be careful because, the immediately preceding and succeeding instants are particularly harmful for observation, when the phænomenon of the diamond ring occurs, the diamond being the minuscule portion of the sun emerging into visibility.

3. What are the ways to observe a solar eclipse?

Only through filters which are absolutely guaranteed to eliminate solar rays of harmful frequency and intensity.

Solar eclipses have been known since antiquity. Yet it must be remembered that classical man had extraordinary knowledge of astronomy, certainly better than the average or even `educated' man of today, and was able to predict rather than merely watch solar eclipses and other astronomical phænomena. Doubtless, initial observations led to damage to the eye, and further attempts must have been more careful.

Watching reflections on a mirror is not safe, as the attenuation is not usually sufficient to remove the danger. Watching reflections on water is also not absolutely safe, though the image has greater attenuation than a mirror. The pin-hole camera {Camera obscura} is the most appropriate one for home observations.
https://www.livescience.com/59721-solar-eclipse-viewer-photo-tutorial.html

4. A false story about Galileo Galilei turning blind due to solar observations persists.
https://aty.sdsu.edu/vision/Galileo.html

5. Antiquity also had many views of a different approach and nature on solar eclipses.
https://www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/solar-eclipse-myths.html

6. A battle was fought between the Lydians and the Medes at the banks of the River Halys in Anatolia/Asia Minor/Asiatic Greece on 28 May 585 B. C. A solar eclipse, predicted by Thales of Miletus, occurred, and the battle was called off. Herodotus writes: `Afterwards, on the refusal of Alyattes to give up his suppliants when Cyaxares sent to demand them of him, war broke out between the Lydians and the Medes, and continued for five years, with various success. In the course of it the Medes gained many victories over the Lydians, and the Lydians also gained many victories over the Medes. Among their other battles there was one night engagement. As, however, the balance had not inclined in favour of either nation, another combat took place in the sixth year, in the course of which, just as the battle was growing warm, day was on a sudden changed into night. This event had been foretold by Thales, the Milesian, who forewarned the Ionians of it, fixing for it the very year in which it actually took place. The Medes and Lydians, when they observed the change, ceased fighting, and were alike anxious to have terms of peace agreed on.' The River Halys was agreed upon as the border between the two nations, and Aryenis the daughter of Alyattes, King of Lydia, was married to Astyages the son of Cyaxares, King of Media. This may be the earliest recorded prediction of an eclipse, and in general, a scientific phænomenon, and also the earliest historical event known precisely by date.

7. A chronology of principal solar eclipses in India:


1868
18 Aug. -> Total solar eclipse, Central India (Belgaum, Kolhapur, Gulbarga, Hyderabad, Masulipatnam, Guntur, Vijayawada, Kakinada).


1871
12 Dec. -> Total solar eclipse, S. India (Mangalore, Coimbatore, Dindigul, Trichinopoly).


1872
6 Jun. -> Annular solar eclipse, S. India (Trichur, Mysore, Coimbatore, Salem, Madras).


1898
22 Jan. -> Total solar eclipse, N. India, Buxar.


1980
16 Feb. -> Total solar eclipse, Central India (Hubli, Raichur, Nalgonda, Konark). First total solar eclipse of the XXth century to be observed in India. https://www.iiap.res.in/?q=solareclipse


1995
24 Oct. -> Total solar eclipse, N. India (Rajasthan, Iradatganj, Calcutta). Deepavali.


1999
11 Aug. -> Total solar eclipse in Central India (Srikakulam).


2009
22 Jul. -> Total solar eclipse in N. India (Bhavnagar, Surat, Ujjain, Indore, Bhopal, Sagar, Jabalpur, Kashi/Benares, Allahabad, Gaya, Patna, Tawang, Guwahati, Dibrugarh). Longest total solar eclipse of the XXIst century. https://www.iiap.res.in/eclipse_varanasi


2010
15 Jan. -> Annular solar eclipse in S. India, Trivandrum. Longest annular solar eclipse of the IIIrd millennium.


2019
26 Dec. -> Annular solar eclipse in S. India, English Malabar (Cannanore, Ceylon).


2020
21 Jun. -> Annular solar eclipse in N. India, Uttarakhand. Summer solstice.

Further keywords and labels: Antumbra, Astronomy, Celestial mechanics, Eclipse, Electromagnetic waves, Eye, Light, Natural philosophy, Occultation, Optics, Physics, Rays, Sight, Solar eclipse, Solar rays, Thales of Miletus, Umbra, Waves, Solar system, Planets, Sun, Moon, Earth, Planetary motion.


Sunday, March 31, 2019

Trump no Russkie

Polly Boiko: Trump no Russkie

Mueller’s collusion delusion: US media is furious their president isn’t a Russian spy

The dysfunction in American politics has reached the bizarre stage where there is visible anger that President Donald Trump didn’t collude with Russia to take the office. Russiagate has been a fixture in the news for two years, where the media sold a story that it wasn’t a case of ‘if’ but ‘when’ Special Counsel Robert Mueller would find evidence to prove that Trump was Moscow’s man in the White House.

Unfortunately, Mueller wasn’t playing ball and – having taken the unprecedented approach of considering facts and not wishful thinking – he concluded that there was no evidence of collusion to be found.

So ICYMI looks at how America is dealing with the fact that Trump may have been elected because people thought he was the best option.

Friday, February 15, 2019

Necrology: A. A. Muchnik

Necrology:

A. A. Muchnik [Albert Abramovich] / Альберт Абрамович Мучник
(2 Jan. 1934 - 14 Feb. 2019)

A. A. Muchnik: `Solution of Post's reduction problem and of certain other problems in the theory of algorithms', Received: 19 Feb. 1957.

"I do not know if you have heard that `Post's problem', whether there are degrees of unsolvability among problems of the form (\exists y) \phi (y,x), where \phi is recursive, has been solved in the positive sense by a very young man by the name of Richard Friedberg. The solution is very elegant. Unfortunately, Friedberg does not intend to study mathematics, but rather medicine (apparently under the influence of his father)."
-- Letter from K. Gödel to J. von Neumann, 20 Mar. 1956 (discovered in the Nachlass of von Neumann, 1988; no reply is known to exist, and von Neumann died on 8 Feb. 1957).

Richard M. Friedberg: `Two recursively enumerable sets of incomparable degrees of unsolvability (solution of Post's problem, 1944)', communicated by K. Gödel, 11 Dec. 1956, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA.

N. B.: Richard M. Friedberg [Michael] (b. 8 Oct. 1935) is a student of T.-D. Lee and Professor Emeritus of Physics at Barnard College and at Columbia University (1968-2003). He is the author of `An Adventurer's guide to Number theory', 1968. His father, Charles K. Friedberg [Kaye] (14 Sep. 1905 - 14 Jul.1972), was the author of `Diseases of the Heart', W. B. Saunders, 1949, 1956, 1966. The books of both father and son are with me.

Indu Satija: I; II